Pritstift Posted July 23, 2019 Share Posted July 23, 2019 Update Titans Solo 16.06.1 wanky and LEBOVIN like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritstift Posted July 25, 2019 Share Posted July 25, 2019 Update blight trio 22.0.4 - will be improved for sure. wanky likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritstift Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 New all-time record for MO : 11.19.0 @Thanks to RadicalX who motivated me to play this map again :-) New all-time record for behind enemy lines: 11.09.7 wanky and LEBOVIN like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halis Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 On 6/22/2019 at 1:42 PM, Treim said: Is it not an option to just tie the ingame time to wins? So essentially the ingame time only counts towards the quest if you also win the map you spend that time in? No way to circumvent that if i didn't overlook something here, because the time only counts towards the quest if you also win the map. If there is a quest where you have to win multiple maps, just dont count the time of the map that completed 1 map So f.e: Complete 1 PvE map: 1. match GoL - 3:30 win 2. matchGoL - 2:00 fail 3. matchGoL - 3:40 win 4. matchGoL - 3:00 fail 5. matchGoL - 4:00 win --> Quest complete after 5th match Complete 2 PvE maps: 1. match GoL - 3:30 win 2. matchGoL - 2:00 fail 3. matchGoL - 3:40 win 4. matchGoL - 3:00 fail 5. matchGoL - 4:00 win --> 1st Quest objective completed --> 1/2 maps completed --> the 1:10 that you spend over the minimum time limit are irrelevant and don't count towards the 2nd quest objective 1. match GoL - 4:30 win 2. matchGoL - 2:00 fail 3. matchGoL - 4:30 win 4. matchGoL - 3:00 fail 5. matchGoL - 3:20 win --> 2nd Quest objective completed If i missed something please tell me as this is just an idea i come up with on the fly. Â That's a nice idea and it would make it more fair. But the problem is, that it is to complicated for new player. Even with your explanation, some players did not understand, what you meant (probably also because of the language barrier). On the other hand everybody understands how it is currently: "You were to fast, so it does not count for quest". That's why I would suggest the following options: Make it that all won games count. Problem: I am sure that MrXlink has good reasons to make it is how it is now. Leave it as it is at the moment. Problem: If you are to fast, you dont get your quest done. Find a better and more fair way. (Kubik has already a nice idea, which will also make the Speedrunners happy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEBOVIN Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 So what it is Kubik idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritstift Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 New all-time-record for nightmare shard duo run: 09.11.5 by Wanky and me. Â wanky likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanky Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 7 minutes ago, Pritstift said: New all-time-record for nightmare shard duo run: 09.11.5 by Wanky and me. Â THX to Ufonek, he motivatet us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halis Posted August 16, 2019 Share Posted August 16, 2019 If I remember it correctly, he want to make it more mission based for gold. But I am not sure anymore. Maybe I am mixed something up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treim Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 new record: Sunbridge - 9:58.3 Pritstift+ Treim wanky and LEBOVIN like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritstift Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 New all-time record for treasure fleet: 15.22.0 wanky likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wanky Posted August 31, 2019 Share Posted August 31, 2019 new solo for Guns   Pritstift likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEBOVIN Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 (edited) New all time records: - Blight 13:03.7 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky September 2019 - Blight 15:59.2 Pritstift + Treim + Wanky September 2019 - Crusade 13:36.4 Pritstift September 2019 Edited September 1, 2019 by LEBOVIN wanky likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treim Posted September 7, 2019 Share Posted September 7, 2019 Battleground 2 Player new record: 22:30.4 Halis likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pritstift Posted September 8, 2019 Share Posted September 8, 2019 New all-time record soultree: 09.24.7. Loriens likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treim Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 (edited) New alltime Blight: 12:45.4 Pritstift + Lebovin + Wanky + Treim Tied alltime Dwarven Riddle: 5:54.1Â Pritstift + Lebovin + Wanky + Treim (not sure if you want to add September as another month the time was achieved in?) New alltime Guns of Lyr: 2:31.3 Mynoduesp + Pritstift + Lebovin + Darkmatter_dark Edited September 9, 2019 by Treim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halis Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 On 8/4/2015 at 8:30 PM, MephistoRoss said: 4-Player Maps: Bad Harvest: 02:43.0 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + MephistoRoss August 2019 Blight: 12:57.1 DrSlavyan + ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss September 2019 Empire: 13.14.5 ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss + Speedy92 August 2019 King of the Giants: 07:49.3 BLU3FIRE + Dannyyx + ducarev + MephistoRoss July 2013 Raven's End: 17:16.9 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky April 2019 The Dwarven Riddle: 05:54.1 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky March 2019 The Guns of Lyr: 02:37.6 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + Speedy92 July 2019 Titans: 16:04.6 Kyuubii + LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky 12-Player Maps: Can you make this looking like this: 4-Player Maps: Bad Harvest: 02:43.0 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + MephistoRoss August 2019 Blight: 12:57.1 DrSlavyan + ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss September 2019 Empire: 13.14.5 ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss + Speedy92 August 2019 King of the Giants: 07:49.3 BLU3FIRE + Dannyyx + ducarev + MephistoRoss July 2013 Raven's End: 17:16.9 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky April 2019 The Dwarven Riddle: 05:54.1 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky March 2019 The Guns of Lyr: 02:37.6 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + Speedy92 July 2019 Titans: 16:04.6 Serval Players* July 2019 *Kyuubii + LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim and LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Wanky Or looking like this: 4-Player Maps: Bad Harvest: 02:43.0 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + MephistoRoss August 2019 Blight: 12:57.1 DrSlavyan + ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss September 2019 Empire: 13.14.5 ducarev + Halis + MephistoRoss + Speedy92 August 2019 King of the Giants: 07:49.3 BLU3FIRE + Dannyyx + ducarev + MephistoRoss July 2013 Raven's End: 17:16.9 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky April 2019 The Dwarven Riddle: 05:54.1 LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim + Wanky March 2019 The Guns of Lyr: 02:37.6 ducarev + Halis + Hittimo + Speedy92 July 2019 Titans: 16:04.6 Kyuubii + LEBOVIN + Pritstift + Treim July 2019 Because the record for Titans was first achieved with 4 Players and days later with 3 Players. I think, it will be confusing for new Speedrunner, if we add 5 Player to a 4 Player map. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MephistoRoss Posted September 11, 2019 Author Share Posted September 11, 2019 Updated the thread and I have added a note to Titans that it are multiple runs (same with Crusade) to avoid confusion. I will fix the layout later when I am on a decent computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halis Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 New solo for Guns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEBOVIN Posted September 15, 2019 Share Posted September 15, 2019 Why don't you add "Introduction" to the rankings aswell? It is featured in Rankings in the client. I believe it should be featured here aswell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halis Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 There was a bug, which let you upgrade your tutorial deck in the Introduction and which got fixed a while ago, if I remember correctly. I also think, it is pretty lame to be Rank 1 on a map which is only availabe in standard difficulty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEBOVIN Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) New Guns Duo 4:11.8 by LEBOVIN and Wanky Regarding ur message: Subjective believes shouldnt influence the rankings. If there is a Ranking for a map it should be shown. No reason to exclude the map cause it is not available on expert. Sorry wrong thread but u see it anyway Edited September 16, 2019 by LEBOVIN wrong thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MephistoRoss Posted September 18, 2019 Author Share Posted September 18, 2019 On 9/15/2019 at 9:52 PM, LEBOVIN said: Why don't you add "Introduction" to the rankings aswell? It is featured in Rankings in the client. I believe it should be featured here aswell. Because the Introduction is not a normal map but just a tutorial in which you can only use the Tutorial deck and have to follow fixed instructions from Moon. In the old BF it was also excluded from the rankings (also ingame), Kubik just shows the rankings ingame now because it is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kubik Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 it was there you want to say it was just empry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MephistoRoss Posted September 18, 2019 Author Share Posted September 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Kubik said: it was there you want to say it was just empry? Yes, maybe not even possible to select it in the drop down, not sure. And I also think it was not possible to tick the Speedrun checkbox in the lobby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kubik Posted September 18, 2019 Share Posted September 18, 2019 I did not add it to the dropdown, but if it was not possible to tick the checkbox, it would explain why it was empty (if it was empty) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Posted by Pritstift,
1 reaction
Go to this post