Kubik

yes
60, 0 is inner size
2 is ID of inner data
6x8B are state hashes
4B count of figures on the map
4B count of entities on map (figures, squads, walls, players, monuments, script markers, ...)
4B step

We fixed the issue hotfix should be out "soon-ish"

Hey, usually it helps the developers if you provide a log so they can investigate - a screenshot isnt much help. On details how to report a bug:


Besides that, it sounds like a connection problem to me - many other Skylords reported that using a VPN helped them. Maybe tree a (free) VPN and check if it helps, and if not, maybe provide a full bug report.

@Vultagx you can search for promo or affinity, just write `promo:YES` or `affinity:fire`
For your second point that is a good suggestion, should not be too hard, maybe @Zyna will use it as an test for next client developer, but do not get hopes too high, I am sure she have a lot of other small tasks to pick from. But maybe you can join the team and ask for it as your first task 🙂
from technical point of view it would be: just getting ID of the dragged card, and doing search for it with `id=346` (for Sunstriders), of course you can just write it to the filter yourself, but who knows all the IDs, but id filter is meant more for developers, or future automation like this one 🙂
It might be doable with just few lines of code actually 🙂
 

@Vultagx you can search for promo or affinity, just write `promo:YES` or `affinity:fire`
For your second point that is a good suggestion, should not be too hard, maybe @Zyna will use it as an test for next client developer, but do not get hopes too high, I am sure she have a lot of other small tasks to pick from. But maybe you can join the team and ask for it as your first task 🙂
from technical point of view it would be: just getting ID of the dragged card, and doing search for it with `id=346` (for Sunstriders), of course you can just write it to the filter yourself, but who knows all the IDs, but id filter is meant more for developers, or future automation like this one 🙂
It might be doable with just few lines of code actually 🙂
 

@Vultagx you can search for promo or affinity, just write `promo:YES` or `affinity:fire`
For your second point that is a good suggestion, should not be too hard, maybe @Zyna will use it as an test for next client developer, but do not get hopes too high, I am sure she have a lot of other small tasks to pick from. But maybe you can join the team and ask for it as your first task 🙂
from technical point of view it would be: just getting ID of the dragged card, and doing search for it with `id=346` (for Sunstriders), of course you can just write it to the filter yourself, but who knows all the IDs, but id filter is meant more for developers, or future automation like this one 🙂
It might be doable with just few lines of code actually 🙂
 

You know that these files are not an actual XML, so knowing structure of real XMLs is helpful, but not necessary. And LUA is mostly defined by interface provided by the game, so knowing plain LUA is again just helpful, but I think anything more than function, calling a function, and creating string from numbers, is not really necessary. And if someone know any programing language all that can be figured out in minutes 😄

Are you aware that this would mean we will need to maintain twice as much cards? (currently what players think of 1 card with 3 upgrades are 4 cards that do not need to have anything in common 😞 I mean literally U0 can be red building, U1 shadow spell, U2 nature squad of 6, and U3 frost squad of 2 battleships requiring only 1 frost orb. That was an crazy example, but only things keeping upgrades same is effort of balance developers doing the changes. So having PvE and PvP version of the card would mean much more effort for them) How would players test these cards outside of PvP? (Forge is PvE 1p, and there is no single player PvP map where players would be able to just test things. So players would lose the ability to test the interactions between these PvP cards.) Have you checked card descriptions in all languages? (Specifically RU have descriptions bigger than EN by about 25% on average, and can be much more in extreme cases. Some descriptions do not really fit well now, so how would you solve it for cards where is no space for longer description?) After reading these points do you think it would make playing PvP harder for players by needing to know things they can not test, and have short vague description at best?

🤔 can you elaborate on that a bit more? I did not understand what is the issue, or how delays would help.

you can use inventory filters "class:female" and "class:male", but I think there is no way for players to figure it out for NPC enemies (even if same-ish card exist as playable does not mean EA make it consistent and set this class same)
 

you can use inventory filters "class:female" and "class:male", but I think there is no way for players to figure it out for NPC enemies (even if same-ish card exist as playable does not mean EA make it consistent and set this class same)
 

If feasible of course.
Not much to add here. I put certain people on my ignore list for a reason, either because they can't keep their mouth shut or grief the game. Unfortunately putting them on ignore doesn't disable their pings and some of them have the tendency to make obnoxious use of it. I suggest either adding such functionality to the ignore list or allow muting chat and pings separately.

Any chance we will see this fixed?

I had the same expierience, and I think having a "buildings/spells only" that requires a workaround to have a unit is rather lackluster.

@Carofex but you could already do that since last year 🙂 and you probably want "copies > 1" instead
if you want to read more: https://forum.skylords.eu/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=11412

you can either try to change the resolution, but based on you saying you do not know what to do with that information, you can can just delete the config file and new one with everything default including the resolution will be created

🤔did you look at this topic?
 

main.rsCargo.toml I do not mind these 2 files `card_templates.rs`contains enum `CardTemplate` which I take out from the proxy, so that contains some `secrets` and I am lazy to filter that out 😛 it also derives `strum_macros::EnumIter` which should be enough for Rust programmer to imagine what it is, and for non Rust programmers the source code would be unreadable, because it is generated with macro.
[WARNING] The code looks terrible, because I did the main logic it in just few minutes 😄 and especially the part that obtains the images is terrible, which was actually harder that the main logic itself 😄 and it contains really hack for mapping IDs.
https://cardbase.skylords.eu/Cards/GetCards is useless because it does not have all cards, like "Amii Paladins", "Bandit Minefield", "Bandit Sniper", "Banzai Lord", "Coat of Protection"...
And fixing that page would not be an easy task 😞 I know because I did looked at it, but if @T1421 want to help... we can talk about it 🙂

options are multiple.
The most complicated one would be to create selection with sliders in the UI, then send that selection to the server, server would send it back to the game, and game would modify the probabilities based on that, but it would also require to change replay format 😞 so some work on server, lot of work in the UI, and lot of work in the client (because I have no clue how to change the replay format)
Rewards could be proportionally decreased.
Another option is to create an UI with check-boxes, then send these check boxes to the server, and server will be skipping seeds until it find one that have that have the wanted. Small work on server, and not that much work in UI (if you can find place for it), that would require no changes to the client because replay would already have all needed information.
Rewards could be proportionally decreased. for example 0 if you select only 1 option, and 100% if you select everything.
And another option I can think of is for test server only user config file that would define this. It would be only small change in the client, and test server replays are not guaranteed to work for others anyway.
And one more option is to open the editor and generate the map yourself, and then play it in the community map section. (No changes required)

"\Documents\BattleForge\config.json"

"\Documents\BattleForge\config.json"

🤔 in MTG you need to play the mana, by "your human action" there is no "mana will be auto-magically played when you try to play a creature".
It would be confusing mechanic at best, why some T1 can be played and some not, not sure if we can even enforce it, but then you would most probably get even more confusing error message.

half-orbs are possible, but which orb would you want to get when first card you spawn is half-orb card? you can not select that orb, so it could create an situation in which it would be the only card you can play on T1, just because all other T1 are for the other orb. That is the reason why half-orb T1, or neutral T1 will not exist.

🤔 in MTG you need to play the mana, by "your human action" there is no "mana will be auto-magically played when you try to play a creature".
It would be confusing mechanic at best, why some T1 can be played and some not, not sure if we can even enforce it, but then you would most probably get even more confusing error message.

half-orbs are possible, but which orb would you want to get when first card you spawn is half-orb card? you can not select that orb, so it could create an situation in which it would be the only card you can play on T1, just because all other T1 are for the other orb. That is the reason why half-orb T1, or neutral T1 will not exist.

I totally get that and that is why I said "ideally" (actually should had been there day 1 pre-SR days) and "nice to have".