Chimaka( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

two thousands seven hundred ...

I mean decks of yours more often are balanced and well-built. Not sure, but in my opinion noone would ever think of your deck to be incomplete. P.S. *thinks to himself* Wow, what a flattery, but I was really expecting Treim to create something like that when I saw this topic. Was waiting for it.

As expected of Treim. *Mein Respektierung*

then it fits perfectly, besides you do not know things)

BaFo = ?

Oooooh, memes. I'm investing some spicy one ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Oh, and there is another sketch. The Magma Hurler. I added some masks to dissolve the squared paper. It looks a bit lazy as a potboiler, but was unable to do it properly, because there are too much thin pencil lines and it would take a lot of time. Just as with Stone Warrior. P.S. Bw, I've just reminded Erias.

Let's see what do we have here, a Lost Soul Ship. I've literally lost the sketch somewhere.

*rolls the dice* Hmmm... do I really want to? I can be really busy with university. *dice still rolls (it has to many sides)* I am about to regret this... *it's rolling*

Can't find DNS, oh god...

I was expecting such outcome. Well, word say for themselves. "I'm in complete agreement."

If there is a possibility of starter decks, I might ask: Isn't it possible to make those starter decks locked as tutorial deck? The reason of starter cards is to START with them. >obvious huh? So to speak we can give OLD F2P list of cards WITH the locked Starter decks. However I'm not into old F2P cards, as other desided. Although there is list of Eirias, which is probably fine, but the Shatter Ice is complitely pointless without any possibility to use it moreover to play 3/4 in your deck. Solution is simple: add the Northland drake with frost affinity and this list will be fine.

If you can choice between Construct and Lincor oh w8 Battleship, better have a Construct. They are both slow, but Construct knocks back all sizes up to XL and has a Siege ability, which is more efficient vs affecting air units and flying. Also construct costs less: 250vs300 for Battleship. Yes I'm matching Battleship with Construct, and you can tell me that I'm not correct, because they have different usage purposes, but does it so different? They are both slow which means mostly they're defencive units, but Construct has great Knock back and Siege with huge dmg-per-shot which means you might use it in siege-attact as well; when Battleship is a flying unit and affects air, also has L-size counter which means you use it against 'manpower' in defence mainly and not for attacking or sieging, because it is slow and has no means to be efficeint in siege. While construct can do both things quite good exept anti-air force. Welp if you want something specializated only of defence and anti-'manpower' XL unit, than get the Battleship, rather get Construct and have a good day&greate life.

Hello again, since I'm not so good at painting, I've just uploaded there the last version of Stone Warrior with Environment. Also I have been working on new art which is Thornbark/Treespirit, both are used (treespirit mostly I think). Here is Sharpened sketch of 'him'.

Welp, If the common rules of the universe work right, then I suppose first picture is New one. Btw It looks REALLY better in comparison.