Ultrakool

Haha nice, it’s always bittersweet to find old screenshots so I know that feeling xD especially if it’s a situation that doesn’t exist anymore.. but not in this case :3

The tome mode in PvP was really dead, even at peak times in the original game. In PvP it was simply unbalanced, because PvP revolves around some cards that are core to their respective factions and tome just makes it a rng-fest. Maybe though... a tome mode for pve might be a lot of fun. But the real reason why tome was removed entirely was that we couldn’t get it to work coding wise, and since the PvP feature was not popular at all anyway... But of course that was before @Ladadoos and @John’s Addition to the team. The prospect of temporary cards personally for me still sounds like a interesting concept, be at a sort of peer to peer card lending system which had some discussion a while back, or a partial or full reinstatement/tweak of the tome system that existed originally. So perhaps in the future we might be considering some aspects of the tome feature, depending on the availability of time and feasibility of that aspect development wise. However for now it’s not within our scope of current plans. All that being said, please stay on topic for this thread and create additional threads for different topics/suggestions. Let me know if you would want to create this as a seperate topic then I could split it.

Off topic is immune ^^

There’s actually a lot being sold as far as I know for like 4K bfp+

Alright guys, this has been going on quite long enough... I do feel that people are who they need to be, and must not be judged for who they are/identify as. However, in the course of this thread, there have been multiple rule 1 infractions in this thread, from both sides and quite frankly you guys have gone wildly off-topic regarding the suggestion itself, I also fail to see the relevance of such a lengthy discussion regarding gender and so on to be made in this particular thread, and furthermore on this game forum. We strive to keep the forums positive and friendly, and as such have tried to limit sensitive topics that are potentially insulting to groups of people. Such responses and conversations hardly create a friendly and welcoming environment. As for the suggestion itself, it shouldn’t be too hard to implement but like someone mentioned it before, it isn’t a very pressing matter. You also make good points about clunkyness and we will certainly seriously consider it. I’ll give you guys a short time to respond to this post, and close the thread shortly after. You guys are welcome to discuss privately if you wish, but I see no benefit to this continuing to be a public discussion for the community as a whole.

You have to follow the instructions on the pop up. That’s how you fix the bug, or it will keep coming up :/

You can’t buy bfp for real life money

Added a poll

@o'Clock what is this regarding exactly?

I think it’s useful let’s say you are building a fire nature deck, and not sure if you want fire/nature start t1. You can easily check prices of both factions. But in the end, it doesn’t matter much and maybe could get confusing results . So if it’s better development wise I think for those cases displaying nothing is fine too

I guess that could be a bug then. Imo, you could do fire shadow 1 orb to either 1) show no cards 2) show both fire and shadow t1 cards. For me personally I think 2) is better but it should definitely not show all cards

It’s a feature Kubik the AH was coded to function that way There’s no neutral orb level 1 card, but yeah fire shadow and t1 should show either fire/shadow tier 1 units I think not all cards

I’m not blaming any one person but it seems like you haven’t read my previous post. Let’s not make personal attacks here. This balancing thread is for pvp and pve alike, let’s try to argue constructively and sensibly

It’s just a matter of knowing the counters to certain strategies. It’s the concept of play and counterplay, if you are not using the correct counterplay concept you will lose a fight plain and simple. For example if your units are knocked around if the power of aggressor is 150,160 or 170 you will still lose the engagement because you are using the wrong strategy. One can also say that the person playing aggressor deserve to win that fight as he’s using the right counterplay to your units. As long as there exists a counterplay I don’t think it should be a point to try to balance according to If people play in a way that they are “playing into their counters”. Put it this way, if you spam 5 small units and get countered by 2 windweavers squad + Hurricane does that make Hurricane op?

Hey guys, Its great that this thread is so active and so many of you guys put in your time and energy to create constructive posts, but I’m starting to get the sentiment that things are starting to get out of hand and into flaming territory. It would be a shame to have to potentially hand out repercussions and so forth. So please refrain from posts that are starting to be in offensive category, and give factual reply to what people’s opinions are. You can disagree with their opinion but you don’t need to do it in a way that potentially attack their character or their person. Thanks.