bobfrog 7 Posted November 9, 2015 Author Share Posted November 9, 2015 sorry, i did mean U0 ^^who is for U1 and why? Link to post Share on other sites
SilenceKiller99 22 Posted November 9, 2015 Share Posted November 9, 2015 iam for U0, because it is the most fair and tho most easy to control Link to post Share on other sites
Eirias 379 Posted November 9, 2015 Share Posted November 9, 2015 iam for U0, because it is the most fair and tho most easy to controlBut U0 has no charges....t1 will turn into who runs out of charges first. Link to post Share on other sites
Ultrakool 773 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 (edited) But U0 has no charges....t1 will turn into who runs out of charges first.I thought you were for U0 or all charges allowed?Anyway, this is starter cards, so basic abilities are not affected by upgrades right? Any core ability of the card gets added on U1? If yes, we could consider it, for eg: Nightcrawler + Frenzy on U1 or RageClaws + Rage on U1, etc...Otherwise I would be down for U0 Edited November 10, 2015 by Ultrakool Link to post Share on other sites
Eirias 379 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 I thought you were for U0 or all charges allowed? Errr...those are two different things.I'm for any upgrade and any charge allowed. Upgrades don't make a huge difference, but having U1 for charges does. It's not really possible to regulate any upgrades more than U0. Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrog 7 Posted November 10, 2015 Author Share Posted November 10, 2015 we could say: deck level not higher than 20. that would add another strategic element, since you could upgrade one card to U2 but keep another on U0. Link to post Share on other sites
Ultrakool 773 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 we could say: deck level not higher than 20. that would add another strategic element, since you could upgrade one card to U2 but keep another on U0.I'm not sure if adding that as a strategic element is a good thing Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrog 7 Posted November 10, 2015 Author Share Posted November 10, 2015 why? Link to post Share on other sites
Azta 4 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 I think the deck level restriction is a good idea. Rather than Upgrade level. Link to post Share on other sites
Ultrakool 773 Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 we could say: deck level not higher than 20. that would add another strategic element, since you could upgrade one card to U2 but keep another on U0.Hmm, 20 would be ok I think. Link to post Share on other sites
Eirias 379 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Hmm, 20 would be ok I think.Why not 40? So, at the minimum, every card can have 1 charge? Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrog 7 Posted November 12, 2015 Author Share Posted November 12, 2015 40 allready seems much for me, people who dont play so much, most likely wont have that much upgrades.To reduce the advantage of people who directly farm upgrades at the beginning, i would keep the number low. But 20 was also just a random number, i dont have a reason, why i chose 20. Link to post Share on other sites
Eirias 379 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 40 allready seems much for me, people who dont play so much, most likely wont have that much upgrades.To reduce the advantage of people who directly farm upgrades at the beginning, i would keep the number low. But 20 was also just a random number, i dont have a reason, why i chose 20.I think 40 is pretty easy to get. 1 upgrade for 20 cards. That's 200 tokens. Link to post Share on other sites
Ultrakool 773 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I think 40 is pretty easy to get. 1 upgrade for 20 cards.That's 200 tokens.well the less there are, the more strategic elements exists in distributing the upgrades. Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrog 7 Posted November 12, 2015 Author Share Posted November 12, 2015 I would go max with 30. But this also depends on how the upgrade system will be on releas. I think its best to add this to the todo list for later.We could also start with a low deck cap for pvp and increas it with every round. But this brings me to another point: How to control the deck level in PvE? There is no enemy, that could check it. Checking every spell that got used in rPvE would be the wurst.So no deck cap here? Link to post Share on other sites
Ultrakool 773 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) I would go max with 30. But this also depends on how the upgrade system will be on releas. I think its best to add this to the todo list for later.We could also start with a low deck cap for pvp and increas it with every round. But this brings me to another point: How to control the deck level in PvE? There is no enemy, that could check it. Checking every spell that got used in rPvE would be the wurst.So no deck cap here?screenshot(with some sort of time stamp)/video when launching game I guess...Units can be checked and some spells actually in the replay. Edited November 12, 2015 by Ultrakool Link to post Share on other sites
Treim 489 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I honestly wont participate if you limit this to hard. Like i can understand why youd want to limit it to f2p cards but deck lvl?Why would you punish people that invested a lot of time in the game early on by limiting their deck lvl. I dont care what you are doing in PVP as i cant really judge how that influences a matchup and stuff, but in PVE, seriously?It is not like i have much time to play when this gets released most likely due to exams and bachelor thesis right after, so it is not like i would profit from no deck lvl cap especially hard, but deck lvl isnt as important in PVE. It is pretty damn easy to beat people just with better execution and superior strategy in PVE, so it is not like they'd get a massive advantage.I will not participate if you limit this to strictly, just letting ya know. Link to post Share on other sites
bobfrog 7 Posted November 12, 2015 Author Share Posted November 12, 2015 The basic idea for this tournament is: same chances for everyone. Obviously with same cards everyone should have the same chance to win (well only depending on skill). So its not about punishing people, its about getting the skill more into the focus.With allowing upgrades but only a few, the chances are still the same, since everyone should be able to get just a few upgrades, and in pro PvP i expect that the upgrades will affect strategies and by this make the game more interesting.I cant realy say how much this would affect PvE. But since you need to spam some units, a higher decklevel than in PvP would make sense. Link to post Share on other sites
LoKilleRs 1 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 i would like to register 2v2&1v1 Link to post Share on other sites
DicKHeaD 0 Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 i would like to register 1 vs 1 or 2 vs 2 its oke for me Link to post Share on other sites
Antwoord 1 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I would like to register for 1vs1. I think it's not a huge problem if a card is upgraded in pvp, but if a player has more charges (especially in the late game) the player white more charges has a huge advantage(at least in my eyes). Link to post Share on other sites
CheatsRichter 0 Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 1vs1 and 2vs2 here IG Name = CheatsRichter Link to post Share on other sites
kainor83 0 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 1v1 and 2v2 Link to post Share on other sites
MrNguyen 1 Posted December 9, 2015 Share Posted December 9, 2015 sign me up for 1v1 and 2v2 Link to post Share on other sites
Numphy 0 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 1v1 and 2v2 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now