Welcome to Skylords Reborn

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Announcements

    • InsaneHawk

      Donations are back   01/17/17

      If you want more information, you can go check this topic : http://forum.skylords.eu/index.php?/topic/2790-donations-are-back/
    • MrXLink

      Future of Skylords Reborn and intro to Ardent Peak   02/10/17

      Dear Skylords, Skyladies, Skythings We have received the awesome news that we have been allowed by EA themselves to continue our project and open up many future possibilities! For all information and stream VODs, please refer to this topic:   
    • MrXLink

      NOTE: Stricter (chat) Rule Enforcement   04/11/17

      Greetings Skylords, Skyladies and Skythings. There has been a lot of commotion going on lately regarding moderation and people calling us out for favouritism and improper judgement. @Kiwi, myself and the rest of the team have had enough of this and we are changing our approach and leniency towards the community drastically, and eliminate this pseudo-favouritism factor. Not that we ever had favourites to begin with, nor in our eyes treated regulars in any way advantageous over others, but we have received several complaints regarding this issue, as well as there have been quite some clashes in chatbox recently. Aside from that, we have decided to act much more strictly about members in the foreseeable future as well.  Considering people have deemed our judgement to be unfair, this will result in us warning the community even for minor infringements, and possibly introducing more temp bans. We feel this is sadly necessary in the current community's state and we're better off having an ordered community in which people see us treat everyone the same way, although in my opinion harshly, and in which members treat staff with respect. As long as the safety and trustworthiness of moderation on the website and discord server is at risk, we will have to make it well-known that we do exert judgement on everyone equally. So from now on, we will be warning people more frequently. This can be for minor insults, misbehaviour, memberating or what we consider as staff disrespect. We're done with the leniency we have once shown here. I'm sad it has to happen this way and of course we will do everything in our power to keep the chatbox a nice, welcoming place. Perhaps this means people will start thinking that we are being sensitive, especially when it comes down to staff disrespect and failure to abide by warnings, but we consider that to be the lesser evil compared to giving members the illusion that we don't consider every member as equal. Equality, understanding, respect and involvement in the community are the cornerstones of community management and moderation, as they also should be within the staff area. So from now on, we are going to monitor this more closely than before. I hope we can treat everyone with understanding and respect here, members and staff alike. We are confident that this approach won't damage the community as much as our currently projected moderation image, valid or not, drags our reliability down. We are all human, and we strive for excellence within community management, moderation and involvement with the community, and aim to execute measures to achieve these goals with respect, passion, and dedication as we did before. We are saddened to have our strictness come to this point. As much as the (chatbox) community has made sure that this became the way it is, we do encourage to take the liberty to speak freely and have a good time here on the forums, as long as said behaviour is in accordance to the forum rules.  Remember, you can find the forum rules over here:  It saddens us to head in this direction, but we feel it will be for the best. We sincerely hope you can all respect this decision, keep the hype up, and have a nice time enjoying the chatbox and its features within a reasonable and orderly manner. Sincerely, and on behalf of @Kiwi and the Skylords Reborn Staff,
      MrXLink, Community Manager

SilenceKiller99

Member
  • Content count

    749
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About SilenceKiller99

  • Rank
    Battlemaster
  • Birthday September 19

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Netherlands
  • Interests
    Battleforge Reborn

Recent Profile Visitors

1741 profile views
  1. I have not yet thought about that, but a quick idea of mine is: - You have deck slots (most likely a unlimited amount, it just matter you have a first, second, third, etc deck) - Each deck has his own ELO, whatever cards you put in - Only deleting the deck will fully reset its ELO This way you can have for example a fire-nature deck in slot 1, a lostsoul deck in slot 2, and maybe a PvE or so deck in slot 3 (which doesn't really need PvP elo, but just mentioning it for all the PvE crybabies). The systems will not notice/care about the changes in the deck, so if you remove 1 card in your first deck (in this case fire-nature), it will keep the ELO of your previous fire-nature deck. This is good, because it is almost the same deck, except that 1 card you changed up (or 2 cards you switched places slots or so). The bad thing would be that if you completely change up the deck, for instance making it stonekin, it will keep the ELO, so in this case YOU MUST delete the deck to remove the ELO. Then your lostsoul deck will swap from slot 2 to slot 1 (keeping its own ELO), your PvE peasant deck will move from slot 3 to slot 2 (also keeping its own ELO, if it had any), and your new stonekin deck wil be created in slot 3 with a fresh ELO. This system would work perfectly fine, I think. Only 'problem' I can think of is the ELO your 'fresh' deck will start at... to high might end up in losing a lot, and maybe losing the motivation to play that different deck, while to low might give you a winning streak (which is fine for you, but very unpleasant for the noobs that you are stomping multiple times in a row) Of course there will be ways to 'exploit' this system or whatever... but this is what I could come up with without thinking to much and with my limited amount of knowledge about ELO and such
  2. Dont ever call it donation again please... A donation literally means when you give something (usually money) to someone for free (you dont get something for it and you dont expect to get something for it) Whenever donaters get something for their donation, its called a purchase instead of a donation. And I will assure you that 90% of your 'donaters' are gonna be purchasers (people who purely give the money for the reward they get/buy, but would not have done it otherwise) Also, a small gift (like non-gameplay wise) would not be considered as a purchase for a lot of people, but giving them an advantage above anyone else is just not donating anymore... its purchasing your way to victory
  3. If you say it like that, it definitely sounds better than infinitely throwing money into the game. Eventhough I dont like the whole money idea, you convinced me that his would be one of the better ways.
  4. It is the bare minimum yes. Thats very much true. It just doesnt feel right to reward people who spent money on the game with actual gameplay influencing boosts... if it were like skins/icons, name changes, etc it would be fine, but just not gameplay changing parts of the game. And if so much people will find it needed to induce their progress in the game, why not just 'upgrade' it for everyone (if that is what the majority of the community wants)?
  5. "The free2play account has access to 100% of the game, but just not the full 100%" "so in iorder that the game stays F2P and dont change into P2W, i hearby got some suggest how to quickly make it P2W" Iam sorry if iam upsetting you, but this is just how i read your sentences... (I gave you a more indetail answer in another thread) (I upvoted you because you gave your own opinion. People downvoted you for that, which is unfair i think) This I read as: "or, maybe, give paying users more currency, so they can buy more boosters and have stronger decks than others." Also, this is equal to just giving people X amount of BFP for X amount of money, or X amount of boosters for X amount of money. This is literally buying the ingame currency with real money. Now I dont necessarily say this is a bad thing, I just say that I think this is a bad thing.
  6. I know this is your own opinion, but I think that there are a lot of people who think this is ridiculous... These two lines of text are basicly a complete guide on how to make the progression system in bfreborn even more shitty than it was in the old battleforge. This is forcing people to spend a lot of time and grind like hell, but saying you can just buy it instead. The way you say it, is getting 1 free booster pack each day, if you pay X amount of money for a premium membership. The price would be unfair anyway, 20 euro a year, means 365 extra boosterpacks for 20 euro. Thats literally what you suggest, to let people buy 365 boosterpacks for 20 euro. Edit: Iam sorry if i accidentally took your words out of context or made you sound different than you want, but i can just not agree with this and not say anything
  7. I wonder if someone did ever read such a thing... If we set up a poll and ask how many people on this forum have read the AGB of the original battleforge, I would be suprised if more than 10 people (out of 10.000) have read it.
  8. Another 5-card-T3 deck: Scavenger,Thugs,Sunstriders,Firesworn_fire,Sunderer,Eruption,Darkelf-Assassins,Nightcrawler,Skyfire-Drake,Gladiatrix_nature,Windhunter_shadow,Ravage,Motivate,Lava-Field,Warriors-Death_frost,Bandit-Lancer_nature,Soulhunter_frost,Swamp-Drake,Surge-of-Light,Curse-of-Oink I made this, eventhough I know bandits is one of the weakest/hardest factions. I just liked it because it has so many options - going with a lot of smaller units and attack different bases (nightcrawlers), use motive and/or heal (if T3 already) - going iwth a single soulhunter and use warriorsdeath - going with skyfiredrakes, windhunters and swampdrakes (never seen this before in pvp, is it any good or at least fun?)
  9. What have you tried? On web version it is double click, so maybe double tap it?
  10. there are other solutions for this, even though they are not implemented in the game (yet). I also kinda think this thread is not usefull, because it would be way smarter to just remove the soft cap on earning BFP than to let everybody create X amount of accounts... The biggest reason for multiaccounts will be for extra BFP, if you remove the soft cap it is as usefull to play on the 'main' account as on any other account... another reason for multiaccounting, as DuellLord mentions above, is to get a different ELO ranking for each deck you play. This could be solved by for instance linking a ELO rating to a specific deck, instead of a player.
  11. @fiki574 @ImperatorSK @Asraiel Buyer would not be guilty if he didn't know he did something illegal. Now, ofcourse he knows... but you've got to make sure of that (e.g. by putting some rules right in your face when you play for the first time). This way nobody can use the 'I didnt know' excuse... And occasionally, if someone really didnt know, he would not be guilty in my opinion. But that would be a really rare case, especially if you show all of the rules really obviously
  12. That other thread, about black market and the possibility to pay for the game now, made me think about the following: Maybe they will add these 'pre-made' locked decks as a pay2use feature. This would actually make sense, even though i hope they wont do this.
  13. @ICE Very nice so far. I listed some things here (some already have been listed above by @Phoenix313) Issue's: - Ranged/melee filter is not working. - Small filter also shows buidlings/spells. - The ordering of the cards looks strange (ordered without any logic, it seems). Features that might be nice to add: - Make it that the cards dont get dark when you use the search filter. Also when using the filter some cards get covered by it, maybe always show the filter or move the cards to the right when using it. - The ability to delete/rename decks. - The ability to remove cards from decks after making it, and changing the order of the cards in the deck. - Maybe a darker background (gray/black), or even an option to choose the color of your background. - An option to share your deck, maybe using a code (like allcards) or a screenshot that gets auto-copied ones you clicked it. - The ability to add more cards to a deck than 20. This might be nice,eventhough the real game only allows 20. (the warning that you passed 20 cards can stay though).
  14. Okey, thats a 2015 quote tho, maybe the situation has changed, even though that seems unlikely. Basically multiaccounting is okay? Thats a shame, but I guess they are right, they cant do anything to stop it without 'hurting' the game itself
  15. Just quoting the official forum rules here: All of what is getting discussed in this thread is stated in the forum rules, including multiaccountin (for every single reason you might think of, so even for separate dekcs/elo stuff). I would prefer that every single case would get investigated extensively... but when it becomes clear that one of the following this are happening, I would prefer an immdiatly penalty (ban/suspension/BFP-fine/etc) for all accomplices. (yeah, i previously posted that the 'buyer' should be left alone, but I have rethought that)