Kubik
-
Content Count
1531 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Posts posted by Kubik
-
-
And merged, so it will go out with next patch for the main server, I guess UI will not be ready by then, so in config.json in section "ui", add "randomize_cards_in_booster" with value true, and be surprised when when it starts working
Metagross31 and Xamos like this -
-
which file? Do you have an exact identification what it claimed to be?
-
-
crashdata_value1280.mdmp
there is something seriously wrong this one is in garbage collection (missing script manager)
crashdata_value1025.mdmp
no clue something deep in the DirectX code so far that one was solved by using different version
crashdata_value1024.mdmp
even weirder something with fonts, are you sure you are not missing any files? (btw what language are you using?)
crashdata_value768.mdmp
something deep in DX 9 specific code
crashdata_defaultvalue.mdmp
even weirder again LUA is missing main thread
to be honest they look like symptoms of something being really wrong
-
1024
that is new, so far people have reported only 1280 and 768 to help with these kind of issues.
Are you sure your files did not get corrupted during download, or something. Can you try downloading all files again?
If that will not help send few different crashdumps, maybe I will figure something out, but I am not too optimistic about that
-
Do you know about anyone who get Ultimap1 or Ultimap2 working?
My guess was that it might be around keyboard handler that we already found, but I can not find mouse click handler
so without better tooling or luck it probably not going to happen
-
it is not the same issue
Go to the config.json and change "maxshader" to one of these values: 1280, 1025, 1024, 768. (You can try them all left to right, if that helps)
-
can you point me to the exact video? I can not find one, and I am not sure if we are talking about same bug, or different issue with damage distribution.
-
Since at least last EA's patch in 2013, but probably even earlier
-
8 minutes ago, Xamos said:
A different approach would be, now that we know exactly how the dmg distribution works, is to upper the max total damage from certain cards and spells that are now underperforming.
So Fire Sphere would need like double its current total dmg. Even then it would not kill the 8 Sunderers in the example however.
So killing 7 squads of Sunstriders, instead of 4, while allowing it to kill almost 3 Constructs instead of just 1? That sounds like really bad solution to me.
-
Well PvP is kind of less affected by fix like this because T1 spells do less damage, which means also less overkill damage is possible. (not saying it would still not be a huge, task though, but my guess is that PvP part would be manageable to test,
would there be even 20 cards to check in T1 and T2? )
-
3 minutes ago, Bkingn said:
buff to make rpve 7-8-9-10 a bit stronger
I would suggest first fixing it first so it does not miss so many enemies
There is optional boss one step sooner (lvl=2 instead of lvl=3), but no unit defined for it, so every time game decides to have it there, it only logs warning that boss is missing
Bkingn likes this -
Sounds technically possible, but I do not think there is single person in the team that have all the required knowledge to do all that
(not even talking about time)
You can open the editor and try for yourself
Dallarian likes this -
Why me? I just provided real time data for how the damage works. Implemented formulas @wibryz write and did some small testing. He is the one who did trough all these numbers to figure out what is wrong and how to fix it. (And I would say it was less than 4 days for the actual analysis and fix
)
8 minutes ago, Xamos said:Looking forward for that Update, tho the Impact might be huge. Strong cards like Shadow Phoenix do even get stronger? Those cards might need some number adjustment accompanied by that bugfix.
How much HP does "usual" targets of Shadow Phoenix have?
Metagross31, Mynoduesp and Damo like this -
It does not specify port on your side, so windows gives it random one each time, so there is nothing to forward, if you would need to forward ports for each outgoing connection, you would need to forward multiple ports per each website
. But when connecting to forge server port is 7501.
-
it should now work again
-
log please
-
combatvalues.xml contains the slot information at the end, and new values will be:
Quotemelee_attacker_free_slots.small_s = 6;
melee_attacker_free_slots.smallex_s = 9;
melee_attacker_free_slots.big_s = 4;melee_attacker_free_slots.small_m = 9;
melee_attacker_free_slots.smallex_m = 15;
melee_attacker_free_slots.big_m = 4;melee_attacker_free_slots.small_l = 12;
melee_attacker_free_slots.smallex_l = 18;
melee_attacker_free_slots.big_l = 6;melee_attacker_free_slots.small_xl = 18;
melee_attacker_free_slots.smallex_xl = 21;
melee_attacker_free_slots.big_xl = 8; -
-
Your numbers are not correct. And there is planned change.
@WindHunter Can I share whole `combatvalues.xml`? And can I share what the change will be, or are the details still a secret?
-
oh if everyone crashed, then it was not a tooltip
so no clue what it was trying to show that did not exist
-
11 minutes ago, CrispyChicken said:
hmm.. yea ID's should never change but in case of plague.. ironie
It is different card, and the old one still exist
-
did you hover over a unit that died, or corpse that disappeared, just at the time of crash?
My only guess is something like the game was trying to create new window (tooltip?) for something that just disappeared.
Shuffling booster card positions when opening boosters
in Suggestions
Posted
I never heard about any game having boosters random, and I think it would be stupid decision, to make it random.