Jump to content

Dying Breed


Sacriefice

Recommended Posts

There are a couple of cards that I feel like discussing, but I don't like collection topics and somehow this card bothers me the most recently. 

I have to mention that I currently don't play pvp, though this card is clearly a pvp card. I used to play some pvp back in the day though.
The old Battleforge wiki even mentions that it is useless in PvE as is

Quote

Can only be useful in PvP.Cannot block PvE unit spawning

With this out of the way, does anyone use that card?
I honestly can't imagine anyone does.

The Card

image_2022-10-10_001858389.png.3b6faff59dcbcce0dcb6ec873f899fdc.png

The cards basic function is to block enemy players from spawning more of the same unit
-> shadow affinity makes it permanent (which is nice for a change considering permanents are pretty rare), well until the unit dies
-> nature affinity is limited to 30s but does 50dmg per second

 

What's wrong with it?
The utmost problem here is that it is a T3 Fire spell with 120 energy cost.
Being T3 already limits its use in pvp, especially as spell, especially for what it does. Now the price is what kills it.
Just to put this into perspective, imagine you play against someone who you know really loves Ashbones, maybe it's even his only t3 unit. So you spent 120 energy to block his Ashbone from procreating. What an act of genius, he is devastated, humiliated even, until, he sacrifices his Ashbone to call another Ashbone...
Net loss to you 120energy
Net loss to him 100energy
Even if he couldn't sacrifice his unit, even if he could never call another Ashbone ever again, that would barely justify the price. Skylords is not a game were amassing a single unit is usually a great strategy. Ironically the more expensive a card is, the less likely your enemy can play out multiple anyway (essentially anything above t3 120 energy are XL units).
As a T3 spell you might as just make it free and it would still be pretty reasonable.

Now I focused on affinity to Shadow. The Nature affinity card is an interesting one, it is quite different by doing 1500 damage to a unit which overshadows its main effect. That's quite a lot for single target damage, but it is still far from great, as it's really slow and there are many cheap option to counter it (passive building heal reduces that ~650 damage (1000HP unit, above 1500HP it will out-heal the damage)

Solution?
The thing is, I really appreciate the general idea of that card, I think Skylords could use some meta (no the other meta) strategies.
Like aforementioned I don't play pvp yet and I suspect it can be applied in PvE, so the following are just some unfunded ideas (not necessarily meant to be used in conjunction)

  • reduce orb requirement to T1 or T2
  • reduce energy cost to ~60
  • (Shadow affinity) permanent, affected unit can't be sacrificed, but the spell can only be applied to one type of unit at a time
  • (Shadow affinity) unit can't be healed
  • (Nature affinity) 30seconds, affected unit permanently looses 2% of their health (max 20) every 2.5 seconds

I think those suggestions match the idea pretty well the name 'dying breed' very well. One makes sure the creature can't 'reproduce' while the other marks it inevitable death.
The last one sounds maybe a bit overpowered at first, even viable for pve, but it would take 2minutes to kill a creature, even longer for anything above 2000 health and obviously wouldn't work on bosses. Another idea with a different standard ability

  • T2
  • as long as the affected creature is alive, every other unit of the same kind (same card) played do not recover from summoning sickness
  • (Shadow affinity) permanent, affected unit looses 10 health every second if there is not another of the same kind 50m around it (max unit cost 100 energy)
  • (Nature affinity) after 5 seconds, for 30 seconds, all other units of the same kind 50m around the affected will loose 40 health every two seconds

The concept here is that one punishes the player indirectly from summoning more of it. Shadow affinity card should be a minor poison like sapping spell, that is less useful if the enemy has already summoned more than one or might encourage him to summon a second ) the energy cost should prevent it to be used on creatures that rarely get played more than once. Nature affinity card does the opposite by punishing the player from having already played more than one. The damage can be avoided though by separating the affected unit temporarily. but both shadow affinity and nature affinity can be used in combination to create a bit of an predicament.
Damage and price is debatable, price should be somewhere around the same as the units its used against, so immediate sacrificing them is about even or slightly favorable to the spellcaster.

This might give the card some value as a counter to wind weaver spam for example

Xamos likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 10/10/2022 at 4:06 AM, Sacriefice said:

The thing is, I really appreciate the general idea of that card, I think Skylords could use some meta (no the other meta) strategies.
Like aforementioned I don't play pvp yet and I suspect it can be applied in PvE, so the following are just some unfunded ideas (not necessarily meant to be used in conjunction)

  • reduce orb requirement to T1 or T2
  • reduce energy cost to ~60
  • (Shadow affinity) permanent, affected unit can't be sacrificed, but the spell can only be applied to one type of unit at a time
  • (Shadow affinity) unit can't be healed
  • (Nature affinity) 30seconds, affected unit permanently looses 2% of their health (max 20) every 2.5 seconds

This card bothered me basically since it existed, because I literally have not seen it being used. And why does a card exist if its not even played by anyone.

I like the fact that you already came up with solutions, which actually sound reasonable. Having access to this card at T2 could actually help Fire in PvP to prevent f.e. a lot of war eagles spawning, or a lot of burrowers. But you still can´t really ignore an enemie unit in PvP, can you? It will just destroy your wells. And if you still have to kill the unit, the effect is gone. 

Your ideas would have following upsides, that one Affinity would be better in PvP (purple) and prevent mass attacks of problematic units, while the other would be useable in PvE (green) and would be stroing vs big targets like harvester. But would that be enough to justify an incusion in your PvP deck? idk

 

I also have some ideas for the card: the way the effect looks, it suggests that if would affect not just one unit but all units in the area around the target. What if this card would introduce light CC for fire? Possible effects could be:

  • the target and all units around it get slowed a lot (weighted down by the burden of being the 'dying breed')
  • the target and all units around it can´t attack for 5 seconds (their attacks get 'locked' as the image suggests - e.g. like the effect of Cyrian)
  • all units around the target flee from the affected unit and have to move out of the circle - freeing the way to focus the target and adding a light CC because all other units run away instead of attacking your units (idea also came from the image, as it looks like there are no allies around the target anymore) - I like this option the most but it sounds the hardest to implement into the game

 

Maybe one of these effects could be added alongside the standard-effect of the card that no units of the same card can be played for 30sec. And paired with the effect that the target takes a %dmg of his max health every 2 sec. 

 

Sacriefice likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2023 at 11:02 AM, Xamos said:
  • the target and all units around it get slowed a lot (weighted down by the burden of being the 'dying breed')
  • the target and all units around it can´t attack for 5 seconds (their attacks get 'locked' as the image suggests - e.g. like the effect of Cyrian)
  • all units around the target flee from the affected unit and have to move out of the circle - freeing the way to focus the target and adding a light CC because all other units run away instead of attacking your units (idea also came from the image, as it looks like there are no allies around the target anymore) - I like this option the most but it sounds the hardest to implement into the game

cc is hard to justify for fire. Especially the second point and 5 seconds sounds kind of weak.
Slow might work, question is if the price of the card makes it worth it. 
Last one is interesting. I wouldn't make it an actual cc but similar to one of my idea, force a situation where the enemy doesn't wants his units standing close (Aura of Pain, Transcendence).

When I wrote my original post I didn't realize that Transcendence and Aura of Pain would've a similar effect, but Transcendence is t4 and even at t3 is not that interesting to single out units anymore. I can imagine that it would be an intriguing tool in t1 or t2 for fire, with spells like Mine or Wildfire already working like an indirect cc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sacriefice said:

with spells like Mine or Wildfire already working like an indirect cc.

Good point, but what would you suggest then? The closer other enemies are to the affected unit, the more damage they take or something like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2023 at 3:39 PM, Xamos said:

Good point, but what would you suggest then? The closer other enemies are to the affected unit, the more damage they take or something like that?

Something like this. My idea is kind of inspired by two Mtg cards a friend of mine used against me once (decades ago). The Rack and Black Vise.
One card makes you take damage if you have less than 3 cards on your hand, the other damages you if you have more than 4. So with both cards in play you can only safely have 3 or 4 cards in your hand. You are not enforced to have more or less cards, but you are discouraged to do so.
I think this creates an interesting dynamic because most effects don't let your enemy room to act upon it. There are a a few spells like disenchant that can counter cc or ravage which kind of counters something like envenom, but very few that create a predicament for the enemy.

Another thing that could be an inspiration is Loner, and ability from another game Impossible Creature. Creatures with Loners get a huge attack boost while they are not close to other friendly unit. If we invert that concept it could work on an enemy unit get a huge debuff while close to other friendly units or while alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sacriefice said:

I think this creates an interesting dynamic because most effects don't let your enemy room to act upon it. There are a a few spells like disenchant that can counter cc or ravage which kind of counters something like envenom, but very few that create a predicament for the enemy.

Another thing that could be an inspiration is Loner, and ability from another game Impossible Creature. Creatures with Loners get a huge attack boost while they are not close to other friendly unit. If we invert that concept it could work on an enemy unit get a huge debuff while close to other friendly units or while alone.

Uh yeah that sounds good to me. Finally something that could make this utterly-useless card a thing! 

My idea of "the units flee from the affected target" would also be pretty nice and fitting, But probably hard/impossible to implement, because right now there is no such feature like "fear" where enemies have to run away right? Sounds like an inverted frenetic assault tho.

So with the compromise that nearby units just get damage (thats the way of fire) the opponent has to act - in PvE the AI cant act but that means that the card might have a use there too. 

The Loner ability also sounds interesting - maybe one affinity could buff your own unit "if alone" and the other affinity affect enemies? (But that sounds more like a spell from the new Amii-faction then, hmm)

 

I still wouldn´t exclude the possibility to add a minor cc to the card as well - frostBite (red) for example makes units attack slower - the red Affinity has to come from somewhere fire related right?

 

 

On 10/10/2022 at 4:06 AM, Sacriefice said:

(Shadow affinity) unit can't be healed

On 10/10/2022 at 4:06 AM, Sacriefice said:
  • (Shadow affinity) permanent, affected unit looses 10 health every second if there is not another of the same kind 50m around it (max unit cost 100 energy)
  • (Nature affinity) after 5 seconds, for 30 seconds, all other units of the same kind 50m around the affected will loose 40 health every two seconds

Your initial ideas also make sense. Anti-Heal, is that present at any other card right now? Could be interesting in PvP to counter Nature, and in PvE to counter those Bandit-Healers (not the boss tho cuz leader immunity).

But we have to be careful to not make it like "Aura of Pain" which simply damages all nearby units. Maybe the longer enemies stay in range, the more damage they get?

Edited by Xamos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dying breed sounds like a unit-class only has a few left. So if you brute-force that on a unit, it would mean to me that now this units-breed is a dying breed. Effect could then be: the more units of the same type are within an area of 30m, the more dmg every unit of that type will receive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use